From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 18 14:15:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77AA16A400 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6723613C458 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6EB207E; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:14:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF942049; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 01EA8545E; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:14:54 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: rick-freebsd@kiwi-computer.com References: <55456.62.212.122.219.1176733664.squirrel@webmail.ledisez.net> <86ps64nzu3.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070416221842.GA56883@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <86bqhn9xl4.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070417161106.GA86245@keira.kiwi-computer.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:14:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070417161106.GA86245@keira.kiwi-computer.com> (Rick C. Petty's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:11:06 -0500") Message-ID: <86lkgplqg1.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ZFS] Problems with SATA disks (SET TRANSFERT MODE ...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:15:02 -0000 "Rick C. Petty" writes: > The ideal solution is to figure out why the Promise doesn't properly > reinitialize after a detach/attach.. if that's even possible. It shouldn't detach / attach in the first place. The primary issue (in my view) is the DMA timeout. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no