From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Aug 29 15:10: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7AA37B401 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7TMA1G12757; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108292210.f7TMA1G12757@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: i386/19245: -fexpensive-optimizations buggy (even with -O) Reply-To: Mikhail Teterin Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR i386/19245; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: mike@FreeBSD.org, bde@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/19245: -fexpensive-optimizations buggy (even with -O) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 18:07:06 -0400 (EDT) > The main reason reason is that I wasn't sure that it was not a FreeBSD > bug. There is now a near-duplicate of this PR (gnu/30181) which says > that the bug is in both the FreeBSD port and original GNU version > of gcc-2.95.3, and analyses generated code to locate the wrong > instructions. It's clear that it is a gcc bug. But on the Mandrake the same code compiles correctly -- that's what I don't understand. In fact, that's the only reason I filed the PR at all -- I know about optimization problems in gcc in general. Did Mandrake patch the compiler somehow? Can we incorporate their fix? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message