From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 24 00:17:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EEE106566C; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A998FC16; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4O0HJmM015818; Fri, 23 May 2008 17:17:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m4O0HI9V015817; Fri, 23 May 2008 17:17:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 17:17:18 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Peter Wemm Message-ID: <20080524001718.GB85398@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200805220214.m4M2EYTM061847@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080521.211110.-749259186.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, jb@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libdwarf Makefile _libdwarf.h dwarf.h dwarf_abbrev.c dwarf_attr.c dwarf_attrval.c dwarf_cu.c dwarf_dealloc.c dwarf_die.c dwarf_dump.c dwarf_errmsg.c dwarf_errno.c dwarf_finish.c dwarf_form.c dwarf_init.c dwarf_loc.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 00:17:28 -0000 On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:38:28AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > Back to this case. There are non-GPL implementations of libdwarf out > there. I think the API is well and truly fair game at this point. In fact SGI's first libdwarf library release was under a BSDL. So if API in the release is the one most common, we can use it without issue from anyone's interpretation of things. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)