From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 13 19:35:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 664) id 0E56116A4CF; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:35:47 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:35:47 +0000 From: David O'Brien To: Eivind Eklund Message-ID: <20041013193547.GB53895@hub.freebsd.org> References: <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com> <416C35A5.4040703@vonostingroup.com> <20041013123840.GB1301@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041013123840.GB1301@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Frank Laszlo cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup Subject: Re: alternative options for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:35:47 -0000 On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:38:40PM +0000, Eivind Eklund wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:51:01PM -0400, Frank Laszlo wrote: > If you've got more *specific* problems with usability (like the batch > build problem above), I'm very interested, as I'm trying to collect > these for doing a new round of fixes for the options support in > bsd.port.mk. BTW, has anyone started to impliment the NO__OPTIONS feature that was requested? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)