From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 15 22:41:18 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA45D16ADC6;
	Mon, 15 May 2006 22:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shaun@inerd.com)
Received: from dione.picobyte.net (host-212-158-207-124.bulldogdsl.com
	[212.158.207.124])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B66E543D6D;
	Mon, 15 May 2006 22:41:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shaun@inerd.com)
Received: from charon.picobyte.net (charon.picobyte.net
	[IPv6:2001:4bd0:201e::fe03])
	by dione.picobyte.net (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Mon, 15 May 2006 23:41:12 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:41:12 +0100
From: Shaun Amott <shaun@inerd.com>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20060515224112.GB2535@picobyte.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
References: <20060515222815.GA2535@picobyte.net>
	<1147732701.9404.44.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1147732701.9404.44.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 (FreeBSD i386)
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: New category - ports/packages specific tools?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:41:18 -0000

On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:38:21AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> 
> 28 is way too little to warrant a category.  Plus you're missing a good
> name for it.
> 

Okay, fair enough. I was hoping some more would surface. And... there's
accessibility, which is even smaller.

-- 
Shaun Amott [ PGP: 0x6B387A9A ]
    Scientia Est Potentia.