From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Jan 16 04:53:43 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA11376 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:53:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA11371 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:53:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.56.130]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAAE94; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 13:53:40 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 14:01:34 +0100 (CET) Organization: Ninth Circle Enterprises From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: Bill Fumerola Subject: Re: misc/9500: `edithook' is not Y2K compliant Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, "Daniel O'Callaghan" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 15-Jan-99 Bill Fumerola wrote: > I'd like to point on the 'perhaps this is...' in my statment, I wasn't > trying to start a holy war. I'll also point out the people you mentioned > are our most represented users, if not the majority. Either way is fine, > I'm just wondering why you're using an obscure format, and I guess the > answer is "it shows we're not biased towards one format". Funny that ye missed to mention the most obvious of all answers Bill ;) YYYY/MM/DD (/serial number) is the way that's the best for source control and logging, because of the speed in which the numerics increase and change the number(s) before it... But then again, I don't think I really have to explain that to ye =) --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven A veil of smoke is what I am, asmodai(at)wxs.nl I wait and I wait... Network/Security Specialist BSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message