From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Mar 14 18:56:10 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9448037B886
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:56:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au)
Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115209>; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 13:56:20 +1100
Content-return: prohibited
From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
Subject: Re: 4.0R ?
In-reply-to: <20000315044042.A14389@happy.checkpoint.com>; from
 mellon@pobox.com on Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:39:55PM +1100
To: Anatoly Vorobey <mellon@pobox.com>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-Id: <00Mar15.135620est.115209@border.alcanet.com.au>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <20000314143326.C9311@dragon.nuxi.com>
 <20000315044042.A14389@happy.checkpoint.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 13:56:19 +1100
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On 2000-Mar-15 13:39:55 +1100, Anatoly Vorobey <mellon@pobox.com> wrote:
>So is there a consensus on when 3.x-STABLE is going to be
>retired?

Current suggestions are that it will go to 3.6 or 3.7 before being
retired.  This will presumably depend on the rate at which 4.x
stabilizes and people move to it, as well as the number of problems
found with 3.x.

> Will there be new releases on the RELENG_3 branch, in fact?

Yes.  At least 2, probably 3.

And this thread really belongs in -stable, not -current.

Peter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message