From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 17 18:15:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8675106567A for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE038FC14 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E661F9CB057; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:13:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EUc-IgA6I0tA; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:13:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C739CB263; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:13:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o3HID2Bl050716; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:13:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:13:02 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Dimitry Andric Message-ID: <20100417181302.GA50462@freebsd.org> References: <20100416160818.GA69460@freebsd.org> <4BC9E9D2.1040505@andric.com> <20100417173321.GA46116@freebsd.org> <4BC9FA7D.4060108@andric.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BC9FA7D.4060108@andric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:15:23 -0000 On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 08:14:21PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-04-17 19:33, Roman Divacky wrote: > >what version of clang/llvm are you using? > > As I mentioned at the end of my previous post: > > >>I'm using the llvm-devel-2.7.r100430 port. > > This is the current devel/llvm-devel port, AFAICS? The system itself > runs -CURRENT as of r206706. sorry.. havent noticed that you wrote that in your first mail yes, i386 has a problem. I am just distilling the testcase and I guess it will be fixed in upstream LLVM in a couple of hours. I'll let you know. thnx for the report!