From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 19 22:34:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1368416A4BF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9B76C43F85; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h7K5YR0U021580;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@repoman.freebsd.org)
Received: (from imp@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h7K5YR62021571;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200308200534.h7K5YR62021571@repoman.freebsd.org>
From: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_tc.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 05:34:28 -0000

imp         2003/08/19 22:34:27 PDT

  FreeBSD src repository

  Modified files:
    sys/kern             kern_tc.c 
  Log:
  Fix an extreme edge case in leap second handling.  We need to call
  ntp_update_second twice when we have a large step in case that step
  goes across a scheduled leap second.  The only way this could happen
  would be if we didn't call tc_windup over the end of day on the day of
  a leap second, which would only happen if timeouts were delayed for
  seconds.  While it is an edge case, it is an important one to get
  right for my employer.
  
  Sponsored by: Timing Solutions Corporation
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.155     +6 -4      src/sys/kern/kern_tc.c