From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 21 21:58:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFA016A41F for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:58:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrea@acampi.hq.inet.it) Received: from acampi.hq.inet.it (out-11.hq.inet.it [194.185.62.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1D643D9B for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:58:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrea@acampi.hq.inet.it) Received: by acampi.hq.inet.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A84DD81; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:58:08 +0100 (CET) Resent-From: andrea@webcom.it Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:58:08 +0100 Resent-Message-ID: <20051221215808.GA30095@webcom.it> Resent-To: current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:54:57 +0100 From: Andrea Campi To: Sam Leffler Message-ID: <20051221215457.GE17950@webcom.it> References: <20051221191919.GB17950@webcom.it> <43A9B5EA.8030905@errno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43A9B5EA.8030905@errno.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Andrea Campi , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic and LOR on -CURRENT with ath X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:58:19 -0000 Sam, On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:07:06PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: > This is a driver lock held across an ioctl that does copyout and the > destination faults. I've tried to get people to buy into a solution to > the general problem w/o luck. Does this only need someone to sit down and code a solution, or is that a broader and not only technical issue? > It appears the mbuf was reclaimed while sitting on the tx queue waiting > to be reaped. I've seen a few complaints of this sort but never enough > info to start looking. This problem seems to be common to soekris h/w > or perhaps this general config which is common on soekris h/w. Knowing > the configuration might be useful; e.g. bridged config? what packet > filter package? network setup? Nope, no bridging; this is nanobsd with a GENERIC kernel minus a lot of stuff plus ipfw (which I also use for NAT). Nothing fancy really. It's not even under any high load. Is there anything I can investigate from DDB? Bye, Andrea -- Press every key to continue.