From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Jul  6  4:20: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8046737B407
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Jul 2001 04:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f66BK7W22452;
	Fri, 6 Jul 2001 04:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 04:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200107061120.f66BK7W22452@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
Subject: Re: kern/28768: The system doesn't get connects on one of his addreses.
Reply-To: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/28768; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
To: "Donskoy V." <dvb@vspu.ru>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/28768: The system doesn't get connects on one of his addreses.
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:18:12 +0300

 On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:42:50PM +0400, Donskoy V. wrote:
 > 
 > >Number:         28768
 > >Category:       kern
 > >Synopsis:       The system doesn't get connects on one of his addreses.
 > >Originator:     Donskoy V.
 > >Release:        FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386
 > >Organization:
 > VSPU
 > >Environment:
 > System: FreeBSD bsd.vspu.ru 4.3-STABLE FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE #3: Thu May 17 16:36:47 MSD 2001 root@bsd.vspu.ru:/usr/src/sys/compile/VSPU i386
 > Network card: Intel EtherExpress 100+, Allied Telesyn AT-2500TX (on Realtek 8139).
 > 
 > >Description:
 > 
 > We have router on FreeBSD 4.3-stable with 2 network cards (IP only). 
 > The networks are divided on two parts: one card (fxp0) has addreses from
 > 1 to 126, the other card (rl0) has addreses from 129 to 254. The first
 > interface has address .2, the second card has .129.
 > 
 > fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
 > 	inet xxx.xxx.xxx.129 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.127
 > 	ether 00:a0:c9:6e:dc:80 
 > 	media: autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active
 > 	supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX <hw-loopback>
 > rl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
 
 Are you sure that the broadcast address should be .127, and not e.g. .255?
 I think that the broadcast address should fall within the netblock
 specified by the address and the netmask.  .127 is definitely not within
 the upper 128 addresses of the /24 block, as specified by an IP address
 of .129 and a netmask of 0xffffff80.
 
 G'luck,
 Peter
 
 -- 
 .siht ekil ti gnidaer eb d'uoy ,werbeH ni erew ecnetnes siht fI

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message