From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 00:35:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B041116A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 00:35:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.nerdshack.com (mail.nerdshack.com [206.123.69.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE6C43D41 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 00:35:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbyrnes@mailshack.com) Received: from cartman.mailshack.com (dialup-56.88.221.203.acc50-kent-syd.comindico.com.au [203.221.88.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nerdshack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26A18BC065; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 19:34:59 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040909103445.023e8340@mail.nerdshack.com> X-Sender: rbyrnes@mail.nerdshack.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 10:36:53 +1000 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu From: Rob B In-Reply-To: <20040909023526.03fe04bd@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20040906143153.N44103@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20040906125305.7f577034@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <413CA557.5090205@makeworld.com> <200409070649.11417.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <413E4849.7060200@kutulu.org> <6.1.2.0.2.20040909092123.023f79f0@mail.nerdshack.com> <20040909023526.03fe04bd@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb and ruby bug on 4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 00:35:05 -0000 At 09:35 AM 9/09/2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:22:33 +1000 >Rob B wrote: > > > For the record - Alpha arch does not exhibit this problem. This is on > both > > 5.3-BETA and 4.10-STABLE > >How sure are you ? > >I have a 5.3-BETA3 that's OK, a 5.2.1R that's not and one that's OK (all >i386). The only difference between them is that the one on which portsdb >crashes is from CD and the other are upgraded by source. Maybe that's a factor - but you are running i386 and I'm not. Rob -- My inner child can beat up your inner child. This is random quote 828 of 1265. Distance from the centre of the brewing universe [15200.8 km (8207.8 mi), 262.8 deg](Apparent) Rennerian Public Key fingerprint = 6219 33BD A37B 368D 29F5 19FB 945D C4D7 1F66 D9C5