From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jan 25  7:58: 2 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F50437B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:57:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id AAA28876;
	Fri, 26 Jan 2001 00:57:18 +0900 (JST)
To: snap-users@kame.net
Cc: Feico Dillema <feico@pasta.cs.uit.no>,
	Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Ronald.vanderPol's message of Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:50:57 +0100.
      <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101251642330.21613-100000@sure.surfnet.nl>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 3976) Re: TI-RPC, IPv6 and NFS (was: Re: strong recommendation re: NFS)
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 00:57:18 +0900
Message-ID: <28874.980438238@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>> 	The above is correct.  NetBSD NFS-over-IPv6 (actually RPC over IPv6)
>> 	is TI-RPC based, and it was done by NetBSD guys not KAME guys.
>Sorry, I was not clear. The question about moving towards TI-RPC was
>directed to freebsd-current. Just out of interest. No critisism intended.

	no, i did not took it as criticism.  i (and feico) just tried to
	clarify.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message