From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 14 10:17:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D6337B402 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:17:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2EIH5lv067522; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:17:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g2EIFkrr067445; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:15:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:15:46 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jan Stocker Cc: Alexander Kabaev , Martin Blapp , tlambert2@mindspring.com, imp@village.org, edhall@weirdnoise.com, kris@obsecurity.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, edhall@screech.weirdnoise.com Subject: Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT Message-ID: <20020314101546.B56417@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020314112547.55cc5786.ak03@gte.com> <000601c1cb7e$b82c18a0$fe02010a@twoflower.liebende.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000601c1cb7e$b82c18a0$fe02010a@twoflower.liebende.de>; from jstocker@tzi.de on Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:36:05PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:36:05PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > 2) Bug is in os delivered gcc but not in port gcc. > a) port has more or less patches / os gcc has been modified > --> Didn't someone told they are the same? Port has less patches. If you look at /usr/src/contrib/gcc/contrib/freebsd.h and /usr/src/contrib/gcc/contrib/i386/freebsd.h you will see how much things have to be modified because we support dual ELF/a.out [still]. > b) other options were set at compile time > --> Why dont change to the same in the port? I am willing to -- the gcc295 port isn't used very much now AFAIK. However, it will probably be once 5-CURRENT moves to a newer version. The FSF GCC people had settings in the i386/freebsd.h file I did not agree with, but it would have been too much pain to change them in the FSF 2.95 release branch. I am willing (and may have to anyway), make the port more agree with the FreeBSD system compiler. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message