From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 07:57:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7AAA4F; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 790DF3D9; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92B601FE023; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:57:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54BE0AAA.4050104@selasky.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:58:34 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: svn commit: r277213 - in head: share/man/man9 sys/kern sys/ofed/include/linux sys/sys References: <201501151532.t0FFWV2Y037455@svn.freebsd.org> <54BDD9E1.6090505@selasky.org> <20150120075126.GA42409@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20150120075126.GA42409@kib.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , Adrian Chadd , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:57:46 -0000 On 01/20/15 08:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 05:30:25AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> On 01/19/15 22:59, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Would you please check what the results of this are with CPU specific >>> callwheels? >>> >>> I'm doing some 10+ gig traffic testing on -HEAD with RSS enabled (on >>> ixgbe) and with this setup, the per-CPU TCP callwheel stuff is >>> enabled. But all the callwheels are now back on clock(0) and so is the >>> lock contention. :( >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> Like stated in the manual page, callout_reset_curcpu/on() does not work >> with MPSAFE callouts any more! > I.e. you 'fixed' some undeterminate bugs in callout migration by not > doing migration at all anymore. > >> >> You need to use callout_init_{mtx,rm,rw} and remove the custom locking >> inside the callback in the TCP stack to get it working like before! > > No, you need to do this, if you think that whole callout KPI must be > rototiled. It is up to the person who modifies the KPI, to ensure that > existing code is not broken. > > As I understand, currently we are back to the one-cpu callouts. > Do other people consider this situation acceptable ? > Hi Konstantin, Please read the callout 9 manual page first. --HPS