From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 16 9:58: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jupiter.linuxengine.net (jupiter2.linuxengine.net [209.61.188.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D0B37B417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:57:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from jupiterweb.commercevault.com (jupiterweb.commercevault.com [209.61.179.16] (may be forged)) by jupiter.linuxengine.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0GHvbx01420; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:57:37 -0600 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:57:33 -0600 (CST) From: John Utz X-X-Sender: To: Kevin Oberman Cc: "Maxim M. Kazachek" , Brady Montz , Subject: Re: VIA crahes - solved (it seems)! In-Reply-To: <20020116174040.546065D32@ptavv.es.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG the K6's come precooked from the factory :-) but i run my k6-II/200 at 233 or so without i'll effects. it's a pretty old piece of silicon and i think the earlier chips had more 'intel-ish' thermal safety margins. i think AMD got braver about pushing the silicon as they got more experience with the manufacturing process, so they end up *selling* the slicon rated at a more aggressive clock speed. but now i am inspired to try to bump mine to 250 and see what happens. :-) it's my home gateway box and it never runs windows. usually i know that i have been too ambitious when gcc barfs abruptly during a kernel compile... On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:23:43 +0600 (NOVT) > > From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > > > I've got a problems on VIA based Lucky Star 5MVP3 motherboard with > > AMD K6-2 233 overclocked to 350 by bus. When I've switched back to 233 the > > problem went away. WinME/Win2K worked fine on 350MHz > > You are very brave to over-clock a K6, although the 233 MHz models > were not too bad. But, in general, it's been widely reported (and I > have personal confirmation) that over-clocking K^ chips is very risky. > > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- John L. Utz III john@utzweb.net Idiocy is the Impulse Function in the Convolution of Life To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message