From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 13:58:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883AC16A41F for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlerota@iskon.hr) Received: from smtp.optima-telekom.hr (smtp.optima-telekom.hr [85.114.35.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF34F43D5A for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlerota@iskon.hr) Received: (qmail 62679 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2005 13:57:04 -0000 Received: from surf212.optima-telekom.hr (HELO redcloud.local) (85.114.34.212) by smtp.optima-telekom.hr with SMTP; 17 Aug 2005 13:57:04 -0000 From: Marko Lerota To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:57:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1124287045.80787.1.camel@redcloud.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mail cluster with rsync X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:58:11 -0000 What do you think about rsync. Is it fast enough for 2000 mail users? I want to do this few times a day: *********** rsync /mail partition ************ * MX1 * ----------------------------- * MX2 * *********** ************ The MTA is qmail with Maildir format, but have also spamassasin and clamav with qscan, so antivir will chew up some CPU. I dont have external storage. First one (MX1) is ment to be LDA and POP3 toaster. The second (MX2) only SMTP for local networks, but if MX1 stops MX2 have to take the control. The hardware will be with 2xCPU new Xeon processors. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco