From owner-freebsd-multimedia Sat Mar 23 17:20:15 1996 Return-Path: owner-multimedia Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA03408 for multimedia-outgoing; Sat, 23 Mar 1996 17:20:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA03389 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 1996 17:20:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA23523; Sat, 23 Mar 1996 17:19:42 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199603240119.RAA23523@precipice.shockwave.com> To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: QCAM & VIC: kernel driver for 2.1-R? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 19 Mar 1996 17:45:46 PST." Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 17:19:41 -0800 From: Paul Traina Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've been wanting to port it back into 2.1 (someone just ported it over to Linux), but I don't have a 2.1 machine handy that I can do kernel hacking on. It should be nearly trivial to port back in, if someone wants to do the honors (or if someone wants to give me root access on a scrap machine that has enough disk space for kernel hacking). Paul From: Doug White Subject: QCAM & VIC: kernel driver for 2.1-R? Hello! As you might have expected, I want to get the kernel driver for qcam. Will it work with 2.1-R? Or should I pull -stable or -current? I would rather be able to integrate it into 2.1-R, as I'm critically short of diskspace at this point. Thanks! Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major