From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 8 19:53:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: www@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256BF16A41F for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:53:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hanche+bounces@math.ntnu.no) Received: from fiinbeck.math.ntnu.no (fiinbeck.math.ntnu.no [129.241.15.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58F0443D49 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:53:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hanche+bounces@math.ntnu.no) Received: (qmail 30142 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2005 19:53:22 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2005 19:53:22 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:53:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20051008.215322.07615533.hanche@math.ntnu.no> To: www@freebsd.org From: Harald Hanche-Olsen X-URL: http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: New web design, font size X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 19:53:26 -0000 First of all, let me congratulate you with the new web design for freebsd.org. It is a vast improvement over the old one. I have one or two gripes, however: The biggest one is the default choice of font sizes: font-size: 69%; Given that this really means 69% of whatever font size the user prefers, I don't think this is such a good idea. I grant that many users don't know how to set the preferred font size in their browser. But that is no excuse for making life harder for those who do. And I'm sure that most readers of www.freebsd.org are technically savvy people who not only knows how, but have carefully configured their browsers to a font size that suits them. Please don't insult those people by essentially telling them that 69% of their preference is better. That said, however, I must applaud your provision of an alternate style sheet, mistitled "Large Text" and setting font-size: 93%; which is still not what the user wanted, but close enough. May I suggest that you make this one the default, and the other one the alternate? And retitle them "Normal text" and "Small text" or something along those lines. I could argue for pages about why this is important, but why not let Jakob Nielsen do the arguing for me? He does so quite eloquently: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20020819.html This topic shows up as the #1 design mistake in his latest Alertbox: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/designmistakes.html By the way, I think that a smaller font size is fine for menus and lists. 69% may be overdoing it, but 80% is probably ok. For running text of more than a couple sentences, however, 100% should be the default. My second gripe is with the fixed width of the page. This gets annoying really fast, particularly when viewed on a laptop with a very high resolution screen. This is design mistake #9 in Jakob Nielsen's list, referred to above. So please look into ways to make the page width variable. It ought to be a question of setting the widths of various design elements in percent rather than pixels. - Harald