From owner-freebsd-scsi Wed Feb 18 11:14:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA14030 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 11:14:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.213.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA13940 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 11:14:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0y5D2i-000518-00; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:12:20 -0800 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:12:19 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: Marty Gordon , Wee Teck Ng , freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: very slow scsi performance In-Reply-To: <199802180725.AAA08524@pluto.plutotech.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >I'm shocked to hear that Western Digital SCSI drives rate really low. All > >my illusions (delusions?) are shattered. Who is King of the Mountain for > >SCSI-3 drives in terms of reliability and performance? I have a Fast/Wide > >controller and I am looking at drives. > > Without a doubt, IBM. I have some doubts about that. Seagate Barracuda work really well too. 20 drives in 24x7 so far, and no failures. Of course, anything is better than cheap Quantum junk. Of the 5 or so, Quantum drives we have, one is dead and one is "unreliable". > >Thanks, > >Marty > >mlghome@home.com > > -- > Justin Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message