From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 17 15:43:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA26970 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 15:43:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA26897 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 15:43:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA08846; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 23:32:37 GMT (envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199712172332.XAA08846@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: dennis cc: Greg Lehey , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig reports bogus netmask In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Dec 1997 19:38:10 EST." <3.0.32.19971216193810.00b3b480@etinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 23:32:36 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [.....] > Even if you specifiy a non-host mask, a host route is set...if that is the > case then only a host mask should be allowed, and a host mask should > be forced. You SHOULD be able to override the host setting, that is, if a > mask is specified explicitly then the route should be set according to the > netmask. I agree, and I'll implement the change unless someone has a good reason not to..... any takers ? > Dennis -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....