From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 1 2: 2:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9084537B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06F043E4A; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:02:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7192GUR047938; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:02:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7192GYn047937; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:02:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:02:16 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Murray Stokely Cc: Sandro Tolaini , Release Engineers , stable@freebsd.org, vendors@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020801090216.GD46812@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Murray, On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:55:44AM -0700, Murray Stokely wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:12:34AM +0200, Sandro Tolaini wrote: > > Just a question about ports: I saw that the ports tree has the matching= tag=20 > > for 4.6.1 release at the same revisions of 4.6 (that is, ports bundled = with=20 > > 4.6.1 release CDs will be the same packaged with 4.6). I think that por= ts=20 > > bundled with 4.6.2 should be more recent. >=20 > The RELEASE_4_6_1 tag in /ports is indeed very similar to the > RELEASE_4_6_0 tag. This is necessary because of the huge amount of > effort that portmgr@ and the entire ports team put into doing quality > assurance work in the month leading up to a release. We can not > simply use the current head of the ports/ tree, because many important > packages are not building. It usually takes us WEEKS to get a package > set put together for 4.X where both KDE and GNOME fully build. The > only way we can provide a package set for our 4.6.X point release is > if we base it off of the 4.6 ports tree, with as few modifications as > possible. >=20 > The packages are all being rebuilt on 4.6.2 machines so that they > are linked with the new OpenSSL libraries, etc.. >=20 > You can always see the build logs for the package cluster at > http://bento.FreeBSD.org. You can also read a little about the setup > in the releng-packages article. While I understand about the testing cycle taking weeks, does this mean that the apache/openssl/other vulnerable ports in 4.6-RELEASE are also not updated? I thought one of the goals of the in-between release was to fix these packages. Could you clarify this? --Stijn --=20 Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9SPkYY3r/tLQmfWcRAjypAJ9uuZfYNK+gNqfFmZSgBE1aOVIBUwCfQJSh N5/8ITrFkw2WQ1hRGY+JyuQ= =x6OA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message