From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 07:49:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5359A16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 07:49:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Dietmar_Michel@bmc.com) Received: from creeper.bmc.com (sky.bmc.com [198.207.223.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C8C13C4A8 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 07:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Dietmar_Michel@bmc.com) Received: from svl-ec-01.adprod.bmc.com (svl-ec-01.adprod.bmc.com [172.20.5.28]) by creeper.bmc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC1B1300EE; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:49:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from fra-ex-01.adprod.bmc.com ([137.72.8.5]) by svl-ec-01.adprod.bmc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:49:50 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:49:47 +0100 Message-ID: <0C398216960631429151B4A4B6B1FC03038CCAB4@fra-ex-01.adprod.bmc.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RAID5 degraded - system hangs Thread-Index: AcdfeLet6z5LrejRRrOKvzMZsoBNpQASpLah References: <0C398216960631429151B4A4B6B1FC03038CCAB0@fra-ex-01.adprod.bmc.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20070305164542.025808f8@mail.computinginnovations.com> From: "Michel, Dietmar" To: "Derek Ragona" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2007 07:49:50.0183 (UTC) FILETIME=[04C88F70:01C75FC4] Cc: Subject: RE: RAID5 degraded - system hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:49:51 -0000 Hi Derek, =20 at least your comment to SATA hot swap is right. But disk failure are during work anyway. So at least after rebooting and = replacing the disk (I reconnected the disk offline and powered on again) = I had to had a chance to rebuild the array. But as described I get no prompt in any boot option. =20 Dietmar ________________________________ From: Derek Ragona [mailto:derek@computinginnovations.com] Sent: Mon 3/5/2007 11:50 PM To: Michel, Dietmar; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID5 degraded - system hangs I'm no expert, but have experienced a few RAID issues. First, RAID 5 = will become degraded and will try to rebuild upon a drive failure, once = the failed drive is replaces. In Mirrored RAID, RAID 1, or RAID 10, the = system will continue to function on the good drive but will alert the = administrator of the drive failure. One last thing, SATA RAID drives, while they are often said to be = hot-swapable, most manufacturer's recommend power-off then swap drives. = With SCSI hot swapable drives they can be swapped with power still on. -Derek At 09:22 AM 3/5/2007, Michel, Dietmar wrote: Hi Guys, =09 =20 =09 I=B4m using an older Server with FreeBSD 6.2 als Fileserver in my home = office. =09 Now I made an upgrade using 4 SATA II disks connected to a promise = TX4310 Raid controller. =09 Defining a RAID5 a bios level, starting the server and building up the = Raid at OS level: =09 # atacontrol create RAID5 32 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 =09 # bsdlable ... =09 # newfs ... =09 =20 =09 And now I have a functional Raid named ar0. =09 =20 =09 At boot time the bios told me that even at this level the raid in = initializing - world seemed to be ok. =09 =20 =09 Now I tried to prove Raid function and disconnect one disk. =09 Theoretical data is covered by the rest of 3 ... but after I get the = system message that one disk has been disconnected the maschine stopps = working. =09 Told me: ar0 raid 5 degarded after a fw minutes no input is possibble.=20 =09 =20 =09 =20 =09 Even after reboot=20 =09 .... =09 ar0: disk0 Ready ar0: disk1 Ready ar0: disk2 Ready ar0: disk3 down no device found =09 ... end of work =09 =20 =09 No single user mode or other starting option seemed to work. =09 I have no chance to rebuild the raid via atacontrol. =09 =20 =09 Any hints? =09 Raid without reliability doesn=B4t make sense! =09 =09 =09 Regards =09 =20 =09 Dietmar=20 =09 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =09 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and=20 dangerous content by MailScanner , and is = believed to be clean.=20 MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for = their support.=20