From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 14 00:17:09 2010
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C6E1065670;
	Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DA78FC0C;
	Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id D4F8356026; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:17:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:17:08 +0000
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org>
Message-ID: <20101214001708.GA31475@lonesome.com>
References: <201012130437.oBD4bHEq008860@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20101213164130.GA48218@atarininja.org>
	<4D06639E.1080405@p6m7g8.com>
	<20101213201407.GC61140@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101213201407.GC61140@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>,
	cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/ibus-chewing distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:17:09 -0000

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:14:08AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Given that we've very recently had an instance where the ProFTPD
> backdoor was initially missed because the committer didn't follow the
> correct process, I am amazed that anyone would use that excuse.

+1

mcl