From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 2 13: 8:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from security.za.net (security.za.net [196.2.146.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA0337B401 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 13:08:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@security.za.net) Received: from localhost (lists@localhost) by security.za.net (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f72K8Vt20125; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 22:08:34 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from lists@security.za.net) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 22:08:31 +0200 (SAST) From: lists To: Peter Pentchev Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wierd IRQ Routing issues In-Reply-To: <20010802230540.B480@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Both boxes are -current :) Thanks Andrew On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:01:25PM +0200, lists wrote: > > Hi, hoping someone can help me out with something here, because Ive got a > > very strange problem. > > > > On my one pc, when assigning an IRQ to my PCIC device, it assigns an IRQ > > and continues, works 100% now that I changed device.hints to look for pcic > > on pci instead of isa, card works everything. > > > > However, on my other pc with an identical setup, when trying to assign > > pcic irq it does this: (from dmesg): > > > > pci_cfgintr_search: linked (3) to configured irq 10 at 0:9:0 > > pci_cfgintr: 0:10 INTA routed to irq 10 > > > > Now for some reason I have it in my head that that irq routing is broken, > > because its the only difference I can find between the non-working box and > > the working box. Is there any way that I can force that card to not use a > > routed interrupt like that. Ive already tried fiddling in my bios with > > the IRQ settings to reserve things etc, no luck there either. I know for > > a fact that irq 5/7/9/10/11 are all available on my box, with nothing > > taking them. > > > > Any ideas would be MUCH appreciated > > The second box wouldn't be a -stable machine, would it now? > I think PCIC IRQ routing was absolutely not working in -stable as of > a few weeks ago, when Warner Losh started MFC'ing the PCIC bits. > That MFC might not be complete yet. > > If both boxes are running -current, I'll just shut up :) > > G'luck, > Peter > > -- > This would easier understand fewer had omitted. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message