From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 11 19:09:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE30A16A484 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@netinertia.co.uk) Received: from starbug.netinertia.co.uk (starbug.netinertia.co.uk [217.147.82.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540C743D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:09:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@netinertia.co.uk) Received: from croydon.netinertia.co.uk ([82.69.247.45] helo=[10.1.0.83]) by starbug.netinertia.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FpVLP-000FOy-Ie; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:11:33 +0100 Message-ID: <448C6AB4.1030300@netinertia.co.uk> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:10:44 +0100 From: James O'Gorman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Widerkrantz References: <86lks38v0a.fsf@tim.hack.org> In-Reply-To: <86lks38v0a.fsf@tim.hack.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NetI-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the Lenovo Thinkpad X60 X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:09:26 -0000 Hi Michael, Michael Widerkrantz wrote: > I have written a text on how I installed FreeBSD 6.1 (and NetBSD and > Ubuntu GNU/Linux) on a Thinkpad X60 with a PXE network install. Perhaps > it can be of use for someone else besides me. > > http://hack.org/mc/freebsd-x60.html Good article. Since you mention third-party patches, you might want to mention Kazuhiro Kondou's Xorg patch to add proper i915 support. See: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2006-May/008324.html > If someone can explain the strange network latency I see on em(4), > that would be very nice. Perhaps I should take that on net-? I saw some latency on the Ethernet interface too. James