From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Mar 11 06:10:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA10506
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 06:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA10501
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 06:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id GAA00634; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 06:06:52 -0800 (PST)
To: Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de>
cc: koshy@india.hp.com (A JOSEPH KOSHY),
        hackers@freebsd.org (Hackers; FreeBSD)
Subject: Re: Comparing FreeBSD and other OSs 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Mar 1996 12:49:54 +0700."
             <199603111153.MAA14681@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de> 
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 06:06:52 -0800
Message-ID: <632.826553212@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> would run rings round the NT box.  So I thought up a scenario:

Sounds like a fair bit of work.

> This would have the advantage of being a benchmark in the public eye,
> and one in which the BSD OSs would have a clear lead.  Any thoughts?

Uh, if you want to run with this then I'd say it has a fair chance of
doing some good, otherwise it'll almost certainly go nowhere.  I can't
think of anyone who'd have the time to administer something like this.

						Jordan