From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 23 11:49:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805091065672 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DB68FC17 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [88.130.213.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868CE8A1438; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:49:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B5AE246.9000301@bsdforen.de> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:49:26 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Folkerts References: <4B5AD030.30705@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4B5AD030.30705@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build of sysutils/polkit, sysutils/policykit, docbook-410 Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:49:29 -0000 Ralf Folkerts wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated my Ports-Tree and tried to rebuild sysutils/policykit (to > 0.9_6) and sysutils/polkit (to 0.96_1) as per UPDATING. > > ... > However, as I have no clue who's correct (the pol.*kit Makefiles by > assuming "catalog" in /share/sgml/docbook/4.1/ or the docbook-410 who > installs into the dtd Subdir) it would be cool if someone could check > this... I second this. > Btw: This is on > > FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0: Fri Dec 11 22:19:58 CET 2009 > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 FreeBSD mobileKamikaze.norad 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Fri Jan 22 22:51:14 CET 2010 root@mobileKamikaze.norad:/usr/obj/HP6510b-8/amd64/usr/src/sys/HP6510b-8 amd64 Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?