From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 11:58:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182BA106564A for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35538FC19 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from [195.4.92.26] (helo=16.mx.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #76) id 1LXaD9-00032k-T1; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:58:31 +0100 Received: from tfb4f.t.pppool.de ([89.55.251.79]:50163 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 16.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #76) id 1LXaD9-00081a-K8; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:58:31 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:58:28 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" Message-ID: <20090212125828.2ff46a75@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <1346.1234436450@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20090212.192851.57971498.haro@kgt.co.jp> <1346.1234436450@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rbgarga@gmail.com, haro@kgt.co.jp, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: @188498: u3g works, Xorg does not X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:58:36 -0000 On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:00:50 +0000 "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote: > In message <20090212.192851.57971498.haro@kgt.co.jp>, haro@kgt.co.jp writes: > > > > >Section "ServerFlags" > > Option "AllowEmptyInput" "off" > >EndSection > > That also works, and avoids four hald processes on the system, so > I prefer this fix. > I agree. Especially since hald eats 100% of one of my cores (AMD64 X2) apparently doing nothing. I remade the xorg server w/o hal and am now a much happier camper. --- Gary Jennejohn