From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Dec 12 8:55:46 2000 From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 08:55:44 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5343237B400 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:55:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 145siE-0005j0-00; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:55:34 +0100 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBCFwup00752 for freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:58:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: SRM: "ISA table corrupt!"? Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <915i00$lt$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <90ouu9$2ni$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <20001207223833.A2651@freebie.demon.nl> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Sender: daemon@mips.inka.de Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Wilko Bulte wrote: > > ERROR: ISA table corrupt! > > Guessing: would this possibly be related to: > > SRM quirks: > PC164 the SRM sometimes seems to loose its variable settings. > "For PC164, current superstition says that, to avoid losing settings, > you want to first downgrade to SRM 4.x and then upgrade to a 5.x" > Other PC164 owners report they have never seen the problem. Yes! I downgraded to SRM 4.9, did isacfg -init init there, upgraded again to SRM 5.5, and now (1) the error above is gone and (2) SRM remembers NVRAM settings. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message