From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Aug 27 11:23:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA24894 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 11:23:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA24881 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 11:23:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (IDENT:2k4RI5GKLXgVST5sM3QOO5xlTt9Vcv6B@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA20632; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 20:22:08 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199808271822.UAA20632@gratis.grondar.za> To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pkg_version tool, revisited Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 20:22:05 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I'm wondering what's the best way to make the new 'n' improved version > available, in an easier-to-find place than a list posting? Should I do this > as a port, despite the fact that the script and manpage together are only > about 12KB, and they're fairly FreeBSD-specific? It seems to me I could > almost package this up in such a way as to make the port self-contained... Make a port, and send-pr(1) it. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message