From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 11 13:44:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA22822 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 13:44:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beer.org (lager.beer.org [199.166.37.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA21904; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 13:40:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hpeyerl@beer.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beer.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA00566; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 14:40:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199806112040.OAA00566@beer.org> X-Authentication-Warning: lager.beer.org: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: core@FreeBSD.ORG, core@netbsd.org, cgd@netbsd.org, ross@netbsd.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Copyright infringement in FreeBSD/alpha From: Herb Peyerl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <563.897597602.1@lager> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 14:40:02 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > I furthermore think that the policy which I've outlined is a good one > given that it's also applicable to a far greater category of potential > conflicts than copyright issues alone, I myself never having seen the > point of publicly airing *any* type of dispute between the *BSDs given > that it only hands additional ammunition to various mutual competitors > who are already more than sufficiently armed as it is, thank you. If > we get a vote here, and I'm hoping that we're discussing your proposal > as a potential option rather than an externally imposed mandate, then > we'd prefer to vote for exercising simple common sense in the future > rather than adopting additional constraints on our communications. If that's how you need to have it handled in the future, then that's fine by me. I was hoping to have all such issues in the future filtered through a small group of people who are able to act in an appropriate and business-like fashion. The sort of flying around (nowhere near the handle, so to speak) that happened in the last couple of days is just a PR disaster waiting to happen and frankly, neither of us needs it. Even my earlier proposal, which I thought was fair and businesslike, generated an extremely abusive response (thankfully in private) and we just don't need that sort of thing anymore... So, it is done. Herb Peyerl Core Group The NetBSD Project. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message