From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 21:07:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107C5106564A; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 21:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juli@clockworksquid.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB2D8FC15; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 21:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so842304gxk.13 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.27.16 with SMTP id e16mr84165ybj.356.1302124077089; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: juli@clockworksquid.com Received: by 10.151.13.12 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:07:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110406210416.GA62173@freebsd.org> References: <201104062008.p36K8NR0015687@svn.freebsd.org> <20110406210416.GA62173@freebsd.org> From: Juli Mallett Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:07:37 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FeR-8U-7HKujZCCXsqpt4ZBDx1Y Message-ID: To: Alexander Best Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ulrich Spoerlein Subject: Re: svn commit: r220401 - in head: . share/mk tools/build/mk tools/build/options X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:07:59 -0000 On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 14:04, Alexander Best wrote: > On Wed Apr =A06 11, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: >> Author: uqs >> Date: Wed Apr =A06 20:08:23 2011 >> New Revision: 220401 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220401 >> >> Log: >> =A0 Complete WITHOUT_CXX support. It implies WITHOUT_GROFF and >> =A0 WITHOUT_CLANG. > > is there no way to build clang/llvm without CXX support? Clang and LLVM are written in C++. Even if their support for compiling C++ could be disabled, you'd still need a C++ cross-compiler to build them, which ought to be disabled by WITHOUT_CXX, right?