From owner-freebsd-ia64 Wed Sep 5 5:31: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from tele-post-20.mail.demon.net (tele-post-20.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B608237B405; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 05:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [62.49.251.130] (helo=herring.nlsystems.com) by tele-post-20.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15ebpZ-000IfH-0K; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:30:57 +0000 Received: from herring (herring [10.0.0.2]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f85CTec43977; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:29:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:29:40 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Alexander Langer Cc: , Subject: Re: Making printf work on ia64 In-Reply-To: <20010905141951.C5586@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Doug Rabson (dfr@nlsystems.com): > > > I have extensively tested this on ia64 and i386 and can't think of any > > problems with it. Still, it would be nice to have a few other eyes look > > Performance differences? I haven't tried to measure any. I doubt that it performs any differently from the existing implementation. It might even be very slightly faster since it reads the argument exactly once and avoids the double-indirection of the existing code. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message