From owner-cvs-all Sun Feb 14 13:31:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA12274 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 13:31:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA12266; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 13:31:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA08466; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 13:31:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 13:31:42 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199902142131.NAA08466@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, "Jordan K. Hubbard" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc amd.map References: <11012.919026904@zippy.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk :Yeah, I don't trust nfs v3. : :> > Modified files: :> > etc amd.map :> > Log: :> > Use more sensible defaults. :> :> Any reason not to use what freefall uses as our default? :> :> freefall: opts:=rw,grpid,resvport,vers=3,proto=udp,nosuid,nodev,intr :> default: opts:=rw,grpid,resvport,vers=2,proto=udp,nosuid,nodev :> :> -- :> -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) I only trust NFS V3 for read-only mounts myself. The only R+W NFS V3 mounts I use are on my test boxes. If I were pushed to it, I might use NFS for lightly-used R+W mounts. Generally speaking, I don't trust NFS at all in a heavy-use production environment and so don't use it in a heavy-use production environment. Of course, this could well be due to getting badly scarred by NFS 3 years ago under 2.0.something. It has gotten a lot more reliable since then. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message