From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 17 17:59:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA26822 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA26816 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id RAA28650; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:56:57 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199601180156.RAA28650@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Building a "custom" release of 2.1.0 To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:56:57 -0800 (PST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, langfod@maui.net, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, phk@critter.tfs.com, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199601171939.MAA03120@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Jan 17, 96 12:39:08 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > > The only problem with devfs is that the author is never happy with it > > and starts re-writing it from the beginning again before ever finishing > > any of the previous versions. :-) > actually I'm kinda happyu with it as it is. The only thing that needs to be done is to add devfs entrys in the SLICE code.. to tell the truth I'd REALLY like BRUCE to do it as he has all that in his head, and I don't feel happy abut doing it.. If that were added it's pretty much complete.. needs some code for removing items and such but we could start using it in earnest if that were done. julian