From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 16 19:21:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C02B1065670 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:21:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vereshagin.org) Received: from mx1.skyriver.ru (ns1.skyriver.ru [89.108.118.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF68B8FC22 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [188.72.240.53]) by mx1.skyriver.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D29F15CC5 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:58:00 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:21:34 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110616192133.GP5630@external.screwed.box> References: <4DF9174F.50708@danskdatacenter.dk> <4DFA03A3.8090500@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20110616152941.GL5630@external.screwed.box> <201106161154.06300.rsimmons0@gmail.com> <20110616162032.GN5630@external.screwed.box> <3d43539af0e60964a0406b8df304f16c.squirrel@www.magehandbook.com> <20110616182011.GO5630@external.screwed.box> <20110616184620.GB68867@guilt.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110616184620.GB68867@guilt.hydra> Organization: ' X-Face: 8T>{1owI$Byj]]a; ^G]kRf*dkq>E-3':F>4ODP[#X4s"dr?^b&2G@'3lukno]A1wvJ_L(~u 6>I2ra/<,j1%@C[LN=>p#_}RIV+#:KTszp-X$bQOj,K Subject: Re: free sco unix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:21:45 -0000 You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions! 2011/06/16 12:46:20 -0600 Chad Perrin => To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : CP> > But both are just words/phrases, right? CP> CP> Here's an example of the difference: Good example, it's on-topic ;-) CP> UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here, speaking Do we need a license to use it? ;-) CP> about the UNIX trademark, its applicability, who owns the trademark, and CP> so on. We just can't claim *we* own it, misapply it to things to which So it's just enough to reserve a copyright on this word usage and we will have just another reason why we can't claim we own it ;-) Sorry my confusion, it's just a new thing to me and it seems as absurd as those ideas. CP> it does not legally apply, and so on (subject to some fair use CP> exceptions, such as parodies). CP> CP> The source code of a closed source UNIX operating system such as HP-UX is CP> not trademarked, because it is not an identifying mark. Because it is CP> subject to copyright, if one of us has legally gained access to it, we CP> cannot just post it all in its entirety to the mailing list (assuming CP> that posting that much source to the list wasn't a problem in and of CP> itself) without violating copyright laws of most industrialized CP> countries -- regardless of what we said about it. CP> CP> The difference is that trademarks are used to identify some entity and CP> its creations, while copyrights are used to censor the redistribution of CP> creations themselves. CP> CP> -- CP> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] 73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB 12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627) -- http://vereshagin.org