From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 2 04:50:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F264C37B401 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 04:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E37C43FAF for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 04:50:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h42BoNUp000665 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 04:50:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h42BoN0i000663; Fri, 2 May 2003 04:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 04:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200305021150.h42BoN0i000663@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: David Schultz Subject: Re: i386/51210: gcc compiler bug with floating point X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Schultz List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 11:50:24 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/51210; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Schultz To: ura@euro-bill.net Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i386/51210: gcc compiler bug with floating point Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 04:42:57 -0700 On Mon, Apr 21, 2003, ura@euro-bill.net wrote: > ttyp4 ~> gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler > Thread model: posix > gcc version 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021119 (release) > > >Description: > When libm(msun) built with -march=pentium4, pow(3) returns incorrect > results. > >How-To-Repeat: > You must have pentium4 processor. gcc 3.2 is known broken in this regard. It is more helpful if you can report this kind of problem to the gcc folks; we don't write the compiler. BTW, does this still happen with a gcc 3.3 snapshot?