From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Sep 5 4:55:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA1837B406; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 04:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vega.vega.com (dialup15-15.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.229.143]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA12532; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:55:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f85Bs4o02417; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:54:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3B9612A4.7F70AE5B@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:55:16 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, ache@nagual.pp.ru, ru@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib strtol.c strtoll.c strtoq.c strtoul.c strtoull.c strtouq.c References: <200109042329.f84NTCo57103@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [redirected to ports@] Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On 4 Sep, David O'Brien wrote: > >> What do you mean exactly? Most of our libc files not have rcsids > > > > That does not mean they should not have them. rcsid's just haven't > > been added yet. I explicited added them to the files you removed them > > from when I added *ll(). Please put them back just the way they were. > > BTW, most of the patches in the ports-tree don't have such IDs, but some > do. Since those IDs are discarded as early as at the "make patch" stage, > I think they are pretty useless -- they don't make it to the compiled > binaries anyway. But what's the general opinion? No, they are pretty useful, IMO. When the user has a problem you can verify version of patches he has and after the problem is resolved tell him "update patxh-xx to the rev.Y.X and you'll be fine". NetBSD for example has $NetBSD$ in all their patches, this also helpful when you need to steal patch from the NetBSD ports collection and add it into FreeBSD one. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message