From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 20 16:07:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575DD1065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:07:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956CD8FC0A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:07:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6KG7R9e003869;
	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:07:27 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q6KG7ReP003866; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:07:27 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:07:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws>
In-Reply-To: <CADGWnjU5Seuovn7d9pRPgwcCdeC98oKa3gBxL2D6ARMqUz9viA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207201806090.3865@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <201207181558.q6IFwM7f033708@fire.js.berklix.net>
	<201207190253.q6J2r3p0070058@mail.r-bonomi.com>
	<CADGWnjU5Seuovn7d9pRPgwcCdeC98oKa3gBxL2D6ARMqUz9viA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:07:28 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:07:33 -0000

> regulations have been tightened further recently as to mandate
> sector-level encryption of the hard disks as well, just to be on the
> sure(rer) side. At least in certain particularly sensitive areas.

which may be a proof that governments know backdoors alloving recovery
from encrypted drives using builtin "hardware encryption" (FDE).

Not that easy with geli ;)