From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 23:34:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B621065731; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:34:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from mail.sippysoft.com (mail.sippysoft.com [4.59.13.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBCE8FC0C; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [4.59.13.245] (helo=[192.168.1.79]) by mail.sippysoft.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QBxxa-0008QM-T3; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:34:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4DACCA7E.9090907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:34:22 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <201104170605.p3H65cab028890@svn.freebsd.org> <20110418181314.GL16958@FreeBSD.org> <4DACB0C3.6000804@FreeBSD.org> <20110418221219.GC1637@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <20110418221219.GC1637@michelle.cdnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sobomax@sippysoft.com X-ssp-trusted: yes Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff , src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r220736 - head/sbin/natd X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:34:34 -0000 On 4/18/2011 3:12 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > SYNCDHCP may restore old behavior of dhclient. Thanks, but I would rather not. -dynamic kinda suggests that the interface can go up and down, so if natd running in the background can handle this condition gracefully instead of silently exit this would be a better approach IMHO. -Maxim