From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 12 07:51:21 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7D5813
 for <freebsd-virtualization@hub.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:51:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from stefan.andritoiu@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763201B83
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:51:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from stefan.andritoiu@gmail.com)
Received: by obcej4 with SMTP id ej4so18520711obc.0
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=UFnGnixUEBqVQryd3v5YCLimJw4K9CFbJmau5WSH2wA=;
 b=ZRA6UXVHVlLQO659CEk7yew9xdnqcpzc7EwAAogK+GMWRnkiC0yPU9Qyoghwd3E9dh
 4Mr/nZnYvluksy16x6rhP0/R50A0EDgFWj6si6aJR5Evd6g5QNodlEYxkqx1VgLZsKkE
 wCz8VIUSEe/ZDnjseIBQiF7hLKoWaxmmyWYZZxKE63SJnuB5V8+5SMRdiAOcL4js1OAf
 PRNsTsNv4Fmf4r3ZAOWaQ7xjzQveA9rqXKk5y/dxQP3z8wBuThAwS1e+dBi0jdj2uMaB
 7RFKqOuar64S/FGacjPNBtzhZCzy9wq9bGTjsnVstBIZJ3XzYRlTeLUTe/7aAuONQO8s
 HXXA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.106.147 with SMTP id f141mr1159911oic.65.1434095480806; 
 Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.82.168 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:51:20 +0300
Message-ID: <CAO3d8=YWAn+9FYUBhnTFee99e7NuZ1VoY9A+Ln-zj=rDHboV+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Are the sched_choose() or tdq_choose() functions called after
 returning from an interrupt?
From: Stefan Andritoiu <stefan.andritoiu@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
 <freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:51:21 -0000

Hello,

When returning from an interrupt, does it switch directly the thread
that was interrupted? Or is the scheduler called to choose a thread to
run (most probable the thread that was interrupted)?

More specifically, are the sched_choose() or tdq_choose() functions
called after returning from an IPI?

Does an interrupt have it's own thread, or does it run in the context
of the interrupted thread as in Linux?

Thank you,
Stefan