From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 17 19:15:19 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA01549
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 19:15:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA01536
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 19:15:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from imb@localhost)
	by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.6.12/BSD4.4)
	id OAA05677; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:12:54 +1100
From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199601180312.OAA05677@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Another cool hack with FreeBSD...
To: max@underdog.maxie.com (James Robertson)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:12:54 +1100 (EST)
Cc: witr@rwwa.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960117215029.14064J-100000@underdog.maxie.com> from "James Robertson" at Jan 17, 96 10:04:58 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> Ouch. ISDN at T-1 prices for here.

No kidding :-(

> But If it were added to FreeBSD, would there be a provider willing to 
> implement it at thier end?

We are an ISP ..

> Unless both ends of the link did it, you'd only get better throughput in
> one direction. I would suspect a new company that offered such a service
> would do very well against the competition though. :-)

 .. yup :-) .. and the additional revenue generated would (should!) be
sufficient to enable us to increase the size of our ISDN pipe if we did our
sums right,

	michael