From owner-freebsd-security  Sun Dec 22 09:52:07 1996
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA14018
          for security-outgoing; Sun, 22 Dec 1996 09:52:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cwsys.cwent.com (0@cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca [142.31.240.113])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA14013
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 1996 09:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cwsys (1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwsys.cwent.com (8.8.4/8.6.10) with ESMTP id JAA00691; Sun, 22 Dec 1996 09:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199612221751.JAA00691@cwsys.cwent.com>
Reply-to: cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca
X-Mailer: Xmh
To: Victor Rotanov <vitjok@fasts.com>
cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: seems like procfs bug... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Dec 1996 17:06:06 GMT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.961222170247.271B-100000@server.fasts.com> 
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 09:51:37 -0800
From: Cy Schubert <cy@cwsys.cwent.com>
Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Hi guys.
> 
> Heres the problem:
> 
> There is r-xr-xr-x file in rwx------ directory.
> When i run it, everyone is able to read it from /proc/<PID>/file.
> Seems like a bug, eh?
> 
> Thanks, bye.
> 				vitjok
> 
> 


Maybe I'm missing something.  I can't reproduce your problem on my 2.1.5
systems.


Regards,                       Phone:  (604)387-8437
Cy Schubert                    OV/VM:  BCSC02(CSCHUBER)
Open Systems Support          BITNET:  CSCHUBER@BCSC02.BITNET
ITSD                        Internet:  cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca
                                       cschuber@bcsc02.gov.bc.ca

                "Quit spooling around, JES do it."