From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  6 21:58:03 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB0637B40A
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  6 May 2003 21:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web13509.mail.yahoo.com (web13509.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.173.13])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DDF943FAF
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  6 May 2003 21:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dyeske@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20030507045759.90653.qmail@web13509.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [68.26.179.53] by web13509.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Tue, 06 May 2003 21:57:59 PDT
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com>
To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030506213717.L5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: stable@freebsd.org
cc: rwatson@FreeBSD.org
cc: arved <arved@FreeBSD.org>
cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
cc: Mario <lioux@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: conf/51910: ucom0 should be generated by MAKEDEV all
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 04:58:04 -0000

--- Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2003, David Yeske wrote:
> 
> > ucom0 is not generated from MAKEDEV all
> 
> You haven't said why this is a problem. Since most users don't have these
> devices, it's probably up to the ones who do to deal with this. Just a
> thought.
> 
> Doug

Most users don't have urio0 or umodem0, should we remove those from being generated from MAKEDEV
all? When should a device be in MAKEDEV, but not be generated via MAKEDEV all?


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com