From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 10 09:33:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53835106564A for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6128FC08 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so532404bkc.13 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:33:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kwv7P4gXiYtkgaJJp4icHFtszTTqiayNJB594lOGikU=; b=nDe1Td7nXA09TgDnAeuULroxb3stUXbrJPPUSjW7Ox1djuqwj+qX2RRwKEkF04W+MO Ws1qmdN+cfkDrMoB1c+5aliIchhCGIrvheAfUeZa9dLetS4fjVOw4egHcFJLz/1Q/BD4 efv8aNhN7blhK5H3rHKXm9RMxi/Xa8jvrdnV3bwdwVMK8Ofh7thIcsk2ENaON8d9gi1+ AmBkbKksSUaTcZkoNDapqCi3Xa7NI77HLFVrPvcIV+UAVn/MIE2ddNEODon2Oz/+j11F 2TmYY3+WmKNG86NNZQ6tQCHMgSJZbx+/jtkmz0eiwK9J+DIzRNEM2b0ETErK1CwzZmcw ri6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.128.213 with SMTP id l21mr866916bks.84.1344591233217; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.231.7 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.231.7 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:33:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:33:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: ports@freebsd.org, thomas.sander@gmx.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:33:55 -0000 Reply from maintainer. On 10 Aug 2012 11:12, "Thomas Sander" wrote: > Hello, > > It has no reason why the version is so old. You can submit a PR. > > B.R. > Thomas > > 2012/8/10 Chris Rees > >> Copying in maintainer. >> On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" wrote: >> >>> kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port >>> devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a >>> little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it >>> should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR. >>> >>> B.R. >>> HU Dong >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >