From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Jul  1 08:37:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA04584
          for chat-outgoing; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 08:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from group.groupnet.net (ali@group.groupnet.net [206.54.250.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA04579
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 08:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ali@localhost)
	by group.groupnet.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA20519;
	Tue, 1 Jul 1997 10:38:26 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 10:38:26 -0500 (CDT)
From: Ali Lomonaco <ali@groupnet.net>
To: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>
cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Why Not Make tcsh the default shell?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970701010119.320B-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970701103313.20506A-100000@group.groupnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


	I don't think thats a good reason.  Packages are very easy  to
install.  Also its bad enough root's editor is ee by default.  If people
don't want csh as their editor, well then chsh is their friend.

--ali

On Tue, 1 Jul 1997, Annelise Anderson wrote:

> Why does FreeBSD install csh as the default shell instead of tcsh?
> 
> Stanford University provides tcsh as the default shell....apparently
> not being concerned about confusing all the hics from Iowa with
> its added features.....
> 
> Annelise
> 
>