From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Nov 10 13:58:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398CD14E5E for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 13:58:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA15515 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 22:58:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id WAA08724 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 22:58:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447B014E5E for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 13:58:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@wintelcom.net) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29219; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 14:22:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 14:22:55 -0800 (PST) From: Alfred Perlstein To: Julian Elischer Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads thread In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Julian Elischer wrote: > Do we allow the thread system to schedule different threads when a thread > get's a pagefault? How can we be sure that teh pagefault is not inteh > scheduler? Can't the kernel know because it can look at which stack or part of the stack is being used? ie. special case for the supervisory thread's stack being active? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message