From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  9 02:52:18 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658E6C54;
 Mon,  9 Sep 2013 02:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jdavidlists@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE772EF2;
 Mon,  9 Sep 2013 02:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 16so534038iea.30
 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 19:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=Ubc+d7Q158p8jgVQoQu1+26i6YuTLPzOdvHah/mQ5yw=;
 b=tU/Boi3m8nMN811Zdki5UnIW13jivM4bd/se7QINvuXb6s+DsVUdG6a32FvKAroRAV
 wZDupKacSMQNjgj72EjXbvBFPO20cdjuZS3Uyqmqlct6drqLn/bUdRMzJ12m8/I9ynWw
 Y9andEspDvA7z6FCuIgVuouVeVTESPxCuD9YhvSMeH8sQ5GlTP1IcEraA7/Yycp8summ
 zKiJ2PMW7CNb+wWyJ5HRKObdqw4CsDu0YsWqCCP4PZ2/RL4LVjRf8SPH2MwwqeJZIWqw
 SZ3VOPFo4L0X3OZANP9SQSJT6LvyVm0JMUAC+Om/wpa61pS+0OW+CoiEl/UZbuycjYXd
 N4KA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.120.6 with SMTP id ky6mr6384038igb.58.1378695137747; Sun,
 08 Sep 2013 19:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jdavidlists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.43.157.8 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 19:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <522D30C9.8000203@bluerosetech.com>
References: <CABXB=RTz6jM=B895Bo6Kp-ZAf2pvTZkm-HfS=PrfX=aMKqjMbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <522D30C9.8000203@bluerosetech.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 22:52:17 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fz4Zs4VkyQJ2IEp3cv5bWXWjEX4
Message-ID: <CABXB=RQoza2YFF81KH_sPksnW5xJuCwd6xaWG4z0TQtS+nOs+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: zfs_enable vs zfs_load in loader.conf (but neither works)
From: J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com>
To: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 02:52:18 -0000

On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Darren Pilgrim
<list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote:
> Did you build and install new boot blocks?

Yes.

Oddly, setting:

zfs set mountpoint=legacy data/root  (plus the appropriate fstab entry)

instead of

zfs set mountpoint=/ data/root

seems to produce a bootable system, although it absolutely should not
be necessary to do things that way anymore.

Weird.