From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 13:57:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98D7106567D for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from webmaster@kibab.com) Received: from smtp.spaceweb.ru (smtp.spaceweb.ru [77.222.41.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3658FC0C for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from webmaster@kibab.com) Received: from [85.140.150.84] (helo=kibab-main.home) by smtp.spaceweb.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jpkkz-0001t1-BB for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:48:01 +0400 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:42:12 +0400 From: Ilya Bakulin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080426174212.6f53034d.webmaster@kibab.com> In-Reply-To: <1209187141.2508.6.camel@localhost> References: <1209187141.2508.6.camel@localhost> Organization: HT-Systems X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: MFC Candidate: convert ffs_softdep.c over to callout(9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:57:37 -0000 On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:19:01 -0400 Coleman Kane wrote: Hi, I have an ability to test this patch on RELENG_7 system (there is no mission-critical data stored on HDD :-) ) What sould I do? Just apply patch, recompile kernel and produce some disk load on that system? > Hi stable users, > > Recently I committed revision 1.219 of src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c to > remove the use of old-style timeout(9) calls in the softdep code and > replace them with the new callout(9) API, to further MPSAFE-ness of the > softdep code. > > I am attaching a patch to RELENG_7 that I'd like some people to test, > which is just an MFC of this code. Can I get any testers (so that I can > MFC this)? > > -- > Coleman Kane > -- Ilya Bakulin